πŸ“š Midland Energy Resources

Core Lesson: Divisional WACC, cost of capital


πŸ“‹ Overview

AttributeDetail
SubjectFinance
Core LessonDivisional WACC, cost of capital
SourceHBS / Top MBA Case

πŸ•°οΈ Background

Midland Energy Resources is a diversified energy company operating in three segments: oil exploration & production (E&P), refining & marketing (R&M), and petrochemicals. CEO Janet Mortensen must calculate a separate cost of capital (WACC) for each division to evaluate capital allocation decisions and project-level investments.


❓ The Central Problem

Nearly identical to the Marriott case in structure: a multi-division company must decide whether to use a single company-wide WACC or divisional WACCs. The three divisions have very different risk profiles β€” E&P is high-beta (commodity price volatility), R&M is moderate (margin-driven), and petrochemicals is lower-beta (contracts, less volatile). Using one WACC misallocates capital.


πŸ“Š Analysis

Students must: (1) Identify comparable pure-play companies for each division, (2) Unlever comparable betas to get asset betas, (3) Re-lever at Midland’s target capital structure for each division, (4) Calculate divisional cost of equity via CAPM, (5) Estimate divisional cost of debt, (6) Compute three separate WACCs. Key debate: choice of risk-free rate (short vs. long government bond) and equity risk premium.


πŸ”‘ Key Lessons

  1. Divisional WACCs are essential for multi-business companies β€” otherwise capital flows to highest-risk divisions
  2. The choice of risk-free rate (T-bill vs. T-bond) significantly impacts cost of equity calculations
  3. Pure-play comparables are imperfect β€” judgment is required in selecting and weighting proxy companies
  4. Tax rate and target capital structure assumptions can materially change the WACC

πŸŽ“ Discussion Questions

  1. How would you select pure-play comparables for each of Midland’s three divisions?
  2. Should Midland use 1-year or 10-year or 30-year Treasury as the risk-free rate? Why?
  3. What happens if Midland uses a single WACC β€” which division benefits and which is penalized?

οΏ½οΏ½ Connected Concepts

WACC, CAPM, Capital Structure, Comparable Company Analysis, DCF Valuation


← πŸ“Š Finance MOC | πŸ“š Case Studies MOC