๐ŸŒฑ ESG Investing

Definition: ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing integrates non-financial factors into investment decision-making to better assess long-term risks and opportunities โ€” alongside traditional financial analysis.

Key frameworks: SASB, GRI, TCFD, ISSB (IFRS S1/S2) AUM in ESG funds: ~$30 trillion globally (2023)


๐Ÿ”‘ The Three Pillars

๐ŸŒ Environmental (E)

How does the company interact with the natural environment?

FactorMeasures
Climate changeGHG emissions (Scope 1, 2, 3), carbon intensity, net-zero commitments
Resource useWater consumption, energy efficiency, waste generation
BiodiversityLand use, deforestation practices
Clean technologyRenewable energy % of mix

Scope 1/2/3 Emissions:

  • Scope 1: Direct emissions (companyโ€™s own operations)
  • Scope 2: Indirect from purchased electricity/heat
  • Scope 3: Value chain emissions (suppliers + customers) โ€” usually 70โ€“90% of total

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Social (S)

How does the company manage relationships with stakeholders?

FactorMeasures
Labor practicesPay equity, safety record, unionization, benefits
Human capitalTraining investment, turnover rate, employee satisfaction
Supply chainSupplier labor standards, conflict minerals
CommunityLocal economic impact, philanthropy
Product safetyRecalls, customer complaints, data privacy
DEIBoard diversity, gender/racial pay gap, inclusion metrics

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Governance (G)

How is the company directed and controlled?

FactorMeasures
Board independence% independent directors, separation of Chair/CEO
Executive payCEO pay ratio, pay-for-performance alignment
Shareholder rightsOne share/one vote, anti-takeover mechanisms
TransparencyQuality of disclosure, audit quality
Anti-corruptionCode of conduct, whistleblower protection
Tax strategyEffective tax rate, tax haven use

๐Ÿ“Š ESG Rating Agencies

Multiple competing rating systems โ€” they often disagree significantly:

AgencyApproachCoverage
MSCI ESG RatingsAAA to CCC; risk-focused8,500+ companies
SustainalyticsUnmanaged risk score (0โ€“100)10,000+ companies
S&P Global ESGScore (0โ€“100)7,000+
ISS ESGPrime/not prime; governance focus6,000+
CDPClimate disclosure grades (Aโ€“F)18,000+ companies

Problem: Correlation between major raters is only ~0.6 โ€” similar companies get wildly different scores.

Why? Different weighting, scope, data sources, and value judgments about what โ€œESGโ€ means.


๐Ÿ’ฐ The ESG-Returns Debate

Evidence ESG Helps Returns:

  • MSCI (2019): High ESG companies had lower cost of capital + lower tail risk
  • Harvard (2012): โ€œHigh sustainabilityโ€ companies outperformed over 18 years
  • Meta-analysis (NYU Stern 2015): 63% of studies show positive ESG-financial relationship

Evidence of Skepticism:

  • Alex Edmans (LBS): Many correlations are reverse causality (profitable firms invest in ESG)
  • โ€œGreenwashingโ€: Companies claim ESG credentials without genuine change
  • Aswath Damodaran: ESG is a marketing label, not alpha source
  • Tariq Fancy (ex-BlackRock): Sustainable finance is a โ€œdangerous placeboโ€

Current consensus: ESG risk management has clear value; alpha generation from ESG is unclear.


๐Ÿ“‹ Key Reporting Frameworks

FrameworkFocusWho Uses It
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative)Broad stakeholder impactMost common globally
SASB (now ISSB)Industry-specific, investor-focusedUS companies
TCFDClimate financial riskBanks, investors
ISSB S1/S2Unified global standard (2023+)New global baseline
EU CSRDEuropean mandatory disclosureEU companies

๐Ÿ”— Connected Concepts


โ† โš–๏ธ Ethics & ESG MOC | Related: Stakeholder Theory ยท Corporate Governance ยท Capital Structure